Show simple item record

dc.contributor.otherHeinOnline
dc.creatorOrenstein, Joseph D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T21:08:11Z
dc.date.available2018-11-30T21:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10898/9302
dc.descriptionCasenote
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMercer University: Walter F. George School of Law
dc.subject.classificationBankruptcy
dc.subject.classificationStates
dc.subject.classificationAdvertising
dc.subject.classificationAttorneys
dc.subject.classificationBankruptcy
dc.subject.classificationFirst Amendment
dc.subject.classificationDebt
dc.titleMercer Law Review Vol. 062 Issue 02-034 pg. 0685 - Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States: In Contemplation of the Meaning, Applicability, and Validity of Attorney Restrictions in the BAPCPA
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation62 Mercer L. Rev. 685 (2010-2011)
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-29T13:42:13Z
dc.format.issue2
dc.format.startpage685
dc.format.volume62


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
36_62MercerLRev685(2010-2011).pdf
Size:
971.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record